Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-15 19:15:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

An opinion of a federal trial court has no precedential value to anther federal trial court in a different district. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Matthew-Schafer-FederalLawFederalCourtsandBindingandPersuasiveAuthority.pdf

Written by 7FF67F02FA30DB9B8FF6EBE4DA109F7F4D35C7F61A72E1837EFF1EB06BD05E43
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812864439156183396

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1812928908678848705
  • noteId - 1812928908678848705
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7FF67F02FA30DB9B8FF6EBE4DA109F7F4D35C7F61A72E1837EFF1EB06BD05E43 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721070909076
  • tweetId - 1812864439156183396
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • An opinion of a federal trial court has no precedential value to anther federal trial court in a different district. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Matthew-Schafer-FederalLawFederalCourtsandBindingandPersuasiveAuthority.pdf