Birdwatch Note
2024-07-15 18:52:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
At the time of composition only the Daily Mail and BBC had published such a story, however these were 11 and 4 minutes prior to posting, and so at the time of writing this statement would have been correct. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz5rpdrxevro https://news.sky.com/story/us-judge-in-florida-dismisses-classified-documents-case-against-trump-13178269 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/15/judge-dismisses-trump-classified-documents-case https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/donald-trump-classified-documents-criminal-case-dismissed-florida-judge-37hfs69xf https://inews.co.uk/news/world/donald-trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-3171538 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/07/15/donald-trump-classified-documents-case-thrown-out/ https://inews.co.uk/news/world/donald-trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-3171538 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13636153/amp/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-judge-rules.html https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/29238044/judge-tosses-donald-trump-classified-documents-case/amp/
Written by 03767172B4C79B5AE996D434E950C614630323963C7E43058BC1EAA8E5A2D9F0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812851918135320738
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812923258703855661
- noteId - 1812923258703855661
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 03767172B4C79B5AE996D434E950C614630323963C7E43058BC1EAA8E5A2D9F0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721069562015
- tweetId - 1812851918135320738
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- At the time of composition only the Daily Mail and BBC had published such a story, however these were 11 and 4 minutes prior to posting, and so at the time of writing this statement would have been correct. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz5rpdrxevro https://news.sky.com/story/us-judge-in-florida-dismisses-classified-documents-case-against-trump-13178269 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/15/judge-dismisses-trump-classified-documents-case https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/donald-trump-classified-documents-criminal-case-dismissed-florida-judge-37hfs69xf https://inews.co.uk/news/world/donald-trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-3171538 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/07/15/donald-trump-classified-documents-case-thrown-out/ https://inews.co.uk/news/world/donald-trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-3171538 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13636153/amp/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-judge-rules.html https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/29238044/judge-tosses-donald-trump-classified-documents-case/amp/