Birdwatch Note
2024-07-15 17:51:44 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN While the proposed CN adds interesting information, I fail to see how it corrects anything incorrect. The post stands on its own as correct information. The Proposed CN is simple more information, a good comment, but no needed as a CN.
Written by E586AFAD10DD963AF4FAF54ADA9C947530D3E969E6B423800511BE294E3A1C9E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812876137443242025
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812907916011446573
- noteId - 1812907916011446573
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E586AFAD10DD963AF4FAF54ADA9C947530D3E969E6B423800511BE294E3A1C9E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721065904036
- tweetId - 1812876137443242025
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN While the proposed CN adds interesting information, I fail to see how it corrects anything incorrect. The post stands on its own as correct information. The Proposed CN is simple more information, a good comment, but no needed as a CN.