Birdwatch Note
2024-07-15 17:05:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Note is needed: 3 statements are made. All 3 stated as fact. The 1st is a non sequitur counterfactual. The 2nd and 3rd are hyperbolic opinions, stated as fact but understood to not be strictly true for implicit effect. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_conditional
Written by A3C263FC89C6385CB7F404ADD43140DE9F7175002E752D728135F311014B3473
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812339636749959574
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812896301584994770
- noteId - 1812896301584994770
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A3C263FC89C6385CB7F404ADD43140DE9F7175002E752D728135F311014B3473 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721063134939
- tweetId - 1812339636749959574
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Note is needed: 3 statements are made. All 3 stated as fact. The 1st is a non sequitur counterfactual. The 2nd and 3rd are hyperbolic opinions, stated as fact but understood to not be strictly true for implicit effect. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterfactual_conditional