Birdwatch Note
2024-07-15 16:11:42 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
While the explanation is correct in who appointed the special prosecutor, Dan never makes mention of it in his post. Leave the legal debate in the comments. This is just an opinion. NNN.
Written by 90578B73BAAA8B11AD0DEE6E9BDE8E798FA4078B1BA6AA42634A7E84B55BEFA8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812858661162668255
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812882744705245635
- noteId - 1812882744705245635
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 90578B73BAAA8B11AD0DEE6E9BDE8E798FA4078B1BA6AA42634A7E84B55BEFA8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721059902728
- tweetId - 1812858661162668255
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- While the explanation is correct in who appointed the special prosecutor, Dan never makes mention of it in his post. Leave the legal debate in the comments. This is just an opinion. NNN.