Birdwatch Note
2024-07-15 12:26:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Beyond "irrelevance", we need a checkbox for "this is the same non-sequitur note getting proposed for all kinds of posts right now as a naked attempt at narrative enforcement".
Written by B76D73FB6DFB2BE0D52579DF2711FCDF064D3AF5F2689604499C27A42E2949E0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812303576930156548
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812825949810905412
- noteId - 1812825949810905412
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B76D73FB6DFB2BE0D52579DF2711FCDF064D3AF5F2689604499C27A42E2949E0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721046361769
- tweetId - 1812303576930156548
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. Beyond "irrelevance", we need a checkbox for "this is the same non-sequitur note getting proposed for all kinds of posts right now as a naked attempt at narrative enforcement".
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-09-25 03:22:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-09-02 13:29:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2025-02-16 06:39:22 -0600 | Rating Details |