Birdwatch Note
2024-07-14 20:45:07 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN All motivation is speculation and there’s no evidence he participated in the primary or for whom he voted if he did. CN is not for arguing conspiracy theories.
Written by 54A219BB381D402D4383C4CC55613B78BDE3408D78E3BE2CEECA247C930A47B2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812510899703628099
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812589165391044967
- noteId - 1812589165391044967
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 54A219BB381D402D4383C4CC55613B78BDE3408D78E3BE2CEECA247C930A47B2 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1720989907966
- tweetId - 1812510899703628099
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN All motivation is speculation and there’s no evidence he participated in the primary or for whom he voted if he did. CN is not for arguing conspiracy theories.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-03 08:59:27 -0600 | Rating Details |