Birdwatch Note
2024-07-14 16:18:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, 1. The tweet doesn't claim it's Yale's. That's in the article which already contains the editor's note for clarification. 2. The article is published and available through Yale's website. To claim it was not "released" by Yale is incorrect. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf
Written by B0D9AC9E70D6BBD1F902D6547B321EE2B482F4CC3B6F84DD2466AAF2FA0D3717
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812453864324338116
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812522001459802469
- noteId - 1812522001459802469
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B0D9AC9E70D6BBD1F902D6547B321EE2B482F4CC3B6F84DD2466AAF2FA0D3717 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1720973894836
- tweetId - 1812453864324338116
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN, 1. The tweet doesn't claim it's Yale's. That's in the article which already contains the editor's note for clarification. 2. The article is published and available through Yale's website. To claim it was not "released" by Yale is incorrect. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf