Birdwatch Note
2024-07-14 13:22:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN: This is a factual representation of the results of the review. Argue the merits of the review in the comments rather than trying to do so anonymously with a CN
Written by 0CE0F3EB0BECA23B80C075EA7B29C999DFC6408524764176B83EF11DAB004470
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812436095629459845
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812477719583617204
- noteId - 1812477719583617204
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0CE0F3EB0BECA23B80C075EA7B29C999DFC6408524764176B83EF11DAB004470 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1720963337214
- tweetId - 1812436095629459845
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN: This is a factual representation of the results of the review. Argue the merits of the review in the comments rather than trying to do so anonymously with a CN
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-06 02:40:25 -0500 | Rating Details |