Birdwatch Note
2024-07-14 10:30:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
I would have general agreed with the CN but using twitter (x) .com as the source makes the note extremely weak & pointless as it points to nothing & does not support the note. NNN - don’t make a note with a useless “source”. Make sure you have an actual source CN contributors!
Written by FE6C6FF275FFB79745752D7F008E3F9796FA24C2624DC4C15FA6C97E3B237CE8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812019764916531674
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1812434524824900012
- noteId - 1812434524824900012
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FE6C6FF275FFB79745752D7F008E3F9796FA24C2624DC4C15FA6C97E3B237CE8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1720953038781
- tweetId - 1812019764916531674
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- I would have general agreed with the CN but using twitter (x) .com as the source makes the note extremely weak & pointless as it points to nothing & does not support the note. NNN - don’t make a note with a useless “source”. Make sure you have an actual source CN contributors!