Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-07 19:33:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The vast majority of people have no musical training, that's irrelevant. And complex/nuanced music like classical or jazz is listened to by a quite small number of people, and even more rarely by the "idly listening crowd" referenced in the OP. http://example.com (why is link needed?)

Written by 397C38F2A8208913C4B053A953FDFE8185B45C999B9DAA48FD10E3BB47385FE5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1809900410456437080

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1810034330909266024
  • noteId - 1810034330909266024
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 397C38F2A8208913C4B053A953FDFE8185B45C999B9DAA48FD10E3BB47385FE5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1720380787958
  • tweetId - 1809900410456437080
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The vast majority of people have no musical training, that's irrelevant. And complex/nuanced music like classical or jazz is listened to by a quite small number of people, and even more rarely by the "idly listening crowd" referenced in the OP. http://example.com (why is link needed?)

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-07-07 19:33:07 UTC
(1720380787958)
2024-07-08 02:42:56 UTC
(1720406576397)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-07-14 02:45:42 UTC
(1720925142742)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-07-08 02:42:56 UTC
(1720406576397)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-08 11:10:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 21:53:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 21:40:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 17:43:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 17:39:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 17:11:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 16:19:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 15:58:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 15:53:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 15:49:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 15:39:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 15:24:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 14:53:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 14:38:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-07 14:37:26 -0500 Rating Details