Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-03 17:30:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - During the interview (25 June) Martin Lewis did not specify which topics he meant would be introduced and are not mentioned in the manifesto. After the backlash (26 June) he responded that he still could not disclose the topic. https://x.com/christiancalgie/status/1805951441493692622?s=46&t=vH7hrHDOrPBx9A1sZOwB5A https://www.ft.com/content/9bd34b5e-6230-47a7-8706-b6c3bc97fac0 https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/sunaks-2000-tax-claim-was-legitimate-but-its-not-the-biggest-issue-n0mjqjstm?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1717598734 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/

Written by 7468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1808531737385091572

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1808553908878381323
  • noteId - 1808553908878381323
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1720027827839
  • tweetId - 1808531737385091572
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN - During the interview (25 June) Martin Lewis did not specify which topics he meant would be introduced and are not mentioned in the manifesto. After the backlash (26 June) he responded that he still could not disclose the topic. https://x.com/christiancalgie/status/1805951441493692622?s=46&t=vH7hrHDOrPBx9A1sZOwB5A https://www.ft.com/content/9bd34b5e-6230-47a7-8706-b6c3bc97fac0 https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/sunaks-2000-tax-claim-was-legitimate-but-its-not-the-biggest-issue-n0mjqjstm?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1717598734 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-07-03 17:30:27 UTC
(1720027827839)
2024-07-04 03:45:52 UTC
(1720064752481)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-07-14 02:45:42 UTC
(1720925142742)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-07-04 03:45:52 UTC
(1720064752481)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-04 01:50:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 20:16:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 20:02:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 19:22:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 19:22:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 19:08:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 18:20:00 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 18:07:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:46:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:44:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:22:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:18:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:15:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:08:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:02:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:00:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 17:00:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:58:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:53:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:48:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:42:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:32:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:31:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:31:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:30:16 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:30:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:29:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:26:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:23:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:20:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:14:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:13:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:08:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:07:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:07:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:04:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 16:02:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:59:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:57:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:47:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:46:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:40:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:39:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:37:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:37:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:36:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 15:35:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-07-03 14:07:42 -0500 Rating Details