Birdwatch Note
2024-07-01 17:58:30 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Das Bundesverfassungsgericht dazu: "Die gesellschaftlichen Auswirkungen blieben hinter denen des Alkoholgenusses zurück. Insbesondere hätten die von der Strafkammer eingeholten Sachverständigengutachten ergeben, daß Haschisch keine Einstiegsdroge für härtere Drogen sei […]" https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/1994/03/ls19940309_2bvl004392.html
Written by 7EAD8BAF5DD1AA6F9E66442FCAB93A74DD7F223E7434B8C0F2E1B9FB949ED34A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1807656528213623011
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1807836192295260614
- noteId - 1807836192295260614
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7EAD8BAF5DD1AA6F9E66442FCAB93A74DD7F223E7434B8C0F2E1B9FB949ED34A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1719856710873
- tweetId - 1807656528213623011
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Das Bundesverfassungsgericht dazu: "Die gesellschaftlichen Auswirkungen blieben hinter denen des Alkoholgenusses zurück. Insbesondere hätten die von der Strafkammer eingeholten Sachverständigengutachten ergeben, daß Haschisch keine Einstiegsdroge für härtere Drogen sei […]" https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidungen/DE/1994/03/ls19940309_2bvl004392.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-07-01 17:58:30 UTC (1719856710873) |
2024-07-02 02:44:10 UTC (1719888250706) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-07-14 02:45:42 UTC (1720925142742) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-07-02 02:44:10 UTC (1719888250706) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-07-06 00:12:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-05 11:06:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-03 05:19:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-02 17:53:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-02 09:50:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-02 06:57:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-02 06:07:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-02 00:27:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-01 16:25:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-01 16:25:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-01 15:32:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-01 14:25:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-01 14:18:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-01 14:07:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-01 13:26:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-01 13:12:41 -0500 | Rating Details |