Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-06-27 21:23:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As confirmed by the other CN, OP is doing this intentionally to benefit from the post going viral, second link to OP admitting it below as further proof. https://x.com/luvlynabi/status/1806389212117356671?s=46 Although I would normally put this in comments, I feel it warrants a CN to reinforce OPs deception. Thank you

Written by E5DE1AAF0E97D8B43E400F20235D9B9241106D5C1121130BD7D5B27354785832
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1806182175521276058

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1806438159154327582
  • noteId - 1806438159154327582
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E5DE1AAF0E97D8B43E400F20235D9B9241106D5C1121130BD7D5B27354785832 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1719523393798
  • tweetId - 1806182175521276058
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As confirmed by the other CN, OP is doing this intentionally to benefit from the post going viral, second link to OP admitting it below as further proof. https://x.com/luvlynabi/status/1806389212117356671?s=46 Although I would normally put this in comments, I feel it warrants a CN to reinforce OPs deception. Thank you

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-06-27 21:23:13 UTC
(1719523393798)
2024-06-28 05:52:58 UTC
(1719553978116)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-07-14 02:45:42 UTC
(1720925142742)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-06-28 05:52:58 UTC
(1719553978116)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-06-28 00:20:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-28 00:17:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 22:44:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 22:27:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 22:20:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 20:28:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 19:31:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 18:42:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 18:36:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 18:29:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 18:19:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 18:04:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 17:53:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 17:49:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 17:45:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 17:39:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 17:11:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 17:11:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 16:57:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 16:51:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 16:42:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-27 16:31:20 -0500 Rating Details