Birdwatch Note
2024-06-18 22:13:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - Post presents a political opinion based on expert calculations and media reports. Debate in the replies. Please refrain from abusing Community Notes. https://www.ft.com/content/9bd34b5e-6230-47a7-8706-b6c3bc97fac0 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/11/civil-service-distances-labour-sunak-lied-tax-row/ https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax claim was perfectly legitimate https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/sunaks-2000-tax-claim-was-legitimate-but-its-not-the-biggest-issue-n0mjqjstm?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1717598734 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/
Written by 7468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1803126966452670552
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1803189356414349327
- noteId - 1803189356414349327
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7468E364E9E2E94EEFB28D98D0215AE154DC569ACA5315315A130241A74D44C0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1718748818864
- tweetId - 1803126966452670552
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - Post presents a political opinion based on expert calculations and media reports. Debate in the replies. Please refrain from abusing Community Notes. https://www.ft.com/content/9bd34b5e-6230-47a7-8706-b6c3bc97fac0 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/11/civil-service-distances-labour-sunak-lied-tax-row/ https://public.conservatives.com/publicweb/Labour-tax-rises.pdf Rishi Sunak’s £2,000 tax claim was perfectly legitimate https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/sunaks-2000-tax-claim-was-legitimate-but-its-not-the-biggest-issue-n0mjqjstm?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1717598734 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13320995/amp/Rachel-Reeves-tax-tsar-claimed-pensioners-ridiculously-good-said-taxed-more.html https://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/tax/rachel-reeves-fought-slash-pension-tax-breaks-high-earners/ https://www.civilserviceworld.com/professions/article/hmrc-labour-expert-panel-modernise-tax-compliance-edward-troup-margaret-hodge https://www.ft.com/content/11e3c349-c1cc-4356-9911-691bc6f0cb17 https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/press-releases/pensioners-gain-1000-on-average-from-policy-changes-since-2010-with-tax-rises-this-parliament-offset-by-triple-lock-boost-for-all-but-the-richest-pensioners/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-06-18 22:13:38 UTC (1718748818864) |
2024-06-19 11:05:22 UTC (1718795122554) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-06-20 06:16:53 UTC (1718864213736) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-06-19 11:05:22 UTC (1718795122554) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-06-19 09:56:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 05:19:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 04:11:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 00:36:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-18 23:22:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-18 18:19:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-18 17:40:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-21 04:27:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-20 02:32:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 16:54:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 16:03:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 14:09:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 05:41:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 05:35:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 03:16:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 02:57:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 01:28:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-19 01:12:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-18 23:46:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-18 23:12:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-06-18 17:35:51 -0500 | Rating Details |