Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-06-17 18:54:45 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Starmer has previously said he she should return and said she shouldn't. Who knows what he really thinks or what will happen. The post expresses a perfectly valid opinion. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/02/23/sir-keir-starmer-changes-tune-shamima-begums-right-return/

Written by F8FB947B30507EB2E2DD66EDAB68E0991E2EB4935A849DE73275670B3B4F9C7E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1802700249573601450

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1802776915897409912
  • noteId - 1802776915897409912
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F8FB947B30507EB2E2DD66EDAB68E0991E2EB4935A849DE73275670B3B4F9C7E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1718650485379
  • tweetId - 1802700249573601450
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Starmer has previously said he she should return and said she shouldn't. Who knows what he really thinks or what will happen. The post expresses a perfectly valid opinion. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2023/02/23/sir-keir-starmer-changes-tune-shamima-begums-right-return/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-06-17 18:54:45 UTC
(1718650485379)
2024-06-18 00:46:41 UTC
(1718671601610)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-06-20 06:16:53 UTC
(1718864213736)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-06-18 00:46:41 UTC
(1718671601610)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-06-18 21:37:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 14:12:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 13:57:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 19:49:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 17:10:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 16:52:11 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 15:59:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 15:20:03 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 14:11:13 -0500 Rating Details