Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-06-17 02:35:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

El artículo de la imagen “tergiversa un estudio que solo analizó los resultados de los pacientes que habrían muerto por insuficiencia respiratoria si no se les hubiera ofrecido soporte vital mecánico, según uno de los investigadores.” https://factual.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33GB8D8

Written by 9A3379BF2B03928367E9C10B599C643518FFE2552C81250AE53631A57BD788E7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1802302295322882508

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1802530388478206307
  • noteId - 1802530388478206307
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9A3379BF2B03928367E9C10B599C643518FFE2552C81250AE53631A57BD788E7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1718591708665
  • tweetId - 1802302295322882508
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • El artículo de la imagen “tergiversa un estudio que solo analizó los resultados de los pacientes que habrían muerto por insuficiencia respiratoria si no se les hubiera ofrecido soporte vital mecánico, según uno de los investigadores.” https://factual.afp.com/doc.afp.com.33GB8D8

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-06-17 02:35:08 UTC
(1718591708665)
2024-06-17 12:30:25 UTC
(1718627425197)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-06-20 06:16:53 UTC
(1718864213736)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-06-17 12:30:25 UTC
(1718627425197)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-06-17 19:52:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 13:56:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 06:41:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 06:23:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 06:21:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 06:21:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 03:54:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 01:28:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-16 23:45:04 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-16 23:17:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-16 23:07:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 23:07:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 20:25:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 15:30:11 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 06:13:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 06:11:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-17 01:48:24 -0500 Rating Details