Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-06-13 20:51:27 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Nordstream 2 pipeline is believed to have been damaged (deliberately or accidentally) by a Chinese container vessel. There is no evidence that the USA was involved. Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/finland-retrieves-anchor-seabed-near-broken-gas-pipeline-2023-10-24/

Written by 15A94681DC12B2BF39CAECC114CC860FF9C57EE09ADAF292799A6871BAD4C94A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1801120694048031109

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1801356735245922767
  • noteId - 1801356735245922767
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 15A94681DC12B2BF39CAECC114CC860FF9C57EE09ADAF292799A6871BAD4C94A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1718311887927
  • tweetId - 1801120694048031109
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The Nordstream 2 pipeline is believed to have been damaged (deliberately or accidentally) by a Chinese container vessel. There is no evidence that the USA was involved. Source: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/finland-retrieves-anchor-seabed-near-broken-gas-pipeline-2023-10-24/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-06-13 20:51:27 UTC
(1718311887927)
2024-06-15 11:52:44 UTC
(1718452364420)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-06-17 02:11:39 UTC
(1718590299183)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2024-06-15 11:52:44 UTC
(1718452364420)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-06-14 05:49:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-14 05:19:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-13 16:47:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-13 15:54:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-14 04:45:03 -0500 Rating Details