Birdwatch Note
2024-06-09 22:49:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Note needed. Ian presents as an alternative thinker yet doesn’t appear to apply his skepticism to RFK or Nicole. In this entire interview he didn’t ask a single question about Ga za, RFK’s out and out doctrine of supporting a war there merits at least simple scrutiny, it got 0: https://youtu.be/p5NqgFx2RlY?si=H8Hc8Pw91E-rn6wZ
Written by F8CC511A2F592336F0210F6838321B800325EB389A91B322DF3AA323698C6E29
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1799923940154114333
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1799936897805885655
- noteId - 1799936897805885655
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F8CC511A2F592336F0210F6838321B800325EB389A91B322DF3AA323698C6E29 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1717973372310
- tweetId - 1799923940154114333
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Note needed. Ian presents as an alternative thinker yet doesn’t appear to apply his skepticism to RFK or Nicole. In this entire interview he didn’t ask a single question about Ga za, RFK’s out and out doctrine of supporting a war there merits at least simple scrutiny, it got 0: https://youtu.be/p5NqgFx2RlY?si=H8Hc8Pw91E-rn6wZ
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2024-06-09 22:49:32 UTC (1717973372310) |
2024-06-10 02:23:37 UTC (1717986217542) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-06-11 02:27:24 UTC (1718072844058) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2024-06-10 02:23:37 UTC (1717986217542) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-06-09 19:51:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-09 19:34:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-09 18:32:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-09 18:05:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-09 18:02:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-10 17:23:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-10 08:00:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-09 21:07:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-10 19:12:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-10 08:06:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-06-09 17:53:04 -0500 | Rating Details |