Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-06-09 22:49:32 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Note needed. Ian presents as an alternative thinker yet doesn’t appear to apply his skepticism to RFK or Nicole. In this entire interview he didn’t ask a single question about Ga za, RFK’s out and out doctrine of supporting a war there merits at least simple scrutiny, it got 0: https://youtu.be/p5NqgFx2RlY?si=H8Hc8Pw91E-rn6wZ

Written by F8CC511A2F592336F0210F6838321B800325EB389A91B322DF3AA323698C6E29
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1799923940154114333

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1799936897805885655
  • noteId - 1799936897805885655
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F8CC511A2F592336F0210F6838321B800325EB389A91B322DF3AA323698C6E29 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1717973372310
  • tweetId - 1799923940154114333
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Note needed. Ian presents as an alternative thinker yet doesn’t appear to apply his skepticism to RFK or Nicole. In this entire interview he didn’t ask a single question about Ga za, RFK’s out and out doctrine of supporting a war there merits at least simple scrutiny, it got 0: https://youtu.be/p5NqgFx2RlY?si=H8Hc8Pw91E-rn6wZ

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-06-09 22:49:32 UTC
(1717973372310)
2024-06-10 02:23:37 UTC
(1717986217542)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-06-11 02:27:24 UTC
(1718072844058)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2024-06-10 02:23:37 UTC
(1717986217542)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-06-09 19:51:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-09 19:34:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-09 18:32:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-09 18:05:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-09 18:02:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-10 17:23:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-10 08:00:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-09 21:07:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-10 19:12:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-10 08:06:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-09 17:53:04 -0500 Rating Details