Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-06-02 10:26:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

According to research she is not "hot". A study by Swami and Furnham (2007) showed tattooed women were rated as less physically attractive (but more sexually promiscuous). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23657810/ This would suggest while they were hot to trot, they were not hot.

Written by 86CB5BBF2707A1337CF8A46F96ACBEE0779431D194F95471EF6324B5FD9D7D44
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1797060139876597891

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1797213284095201686
  • noteId - 1797213284095201686
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 86CB5BBF2707A1337CF8A46F96ACBEE0779431D194F95471EF6324B5FD9D7D44 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1717324012192
  • tweetId - 1797060139876597891
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • According to research she is not "hot". A study by Swami and Furnham (2007) showed tattooed women were rated as less physically attractive (but more sexually promiscuous). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23657810/ This would suggest while they were hot to trot, they were not hot.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-06-02 10:26:52 UTC
(1717324012192)
2024-06-03 01:54:26 UTC
(1717379666300)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-06-03 03:30:22 UTC
(1717385422041)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-06-03 01:54:26 UTC
(1717379666300)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-06-02 08:16:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-02 05:32:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-02 17:57:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-02 05:48:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-06-02 10:19:51 -0500 Rating Details