Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-05-26 15:51:42 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Glass Onion has a 91% critic score and a 92% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. The OP may have personally disliked the film, which is fine, but to claim it was bad by any standard other than your own is misleading. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/glass_onion_a_knives_out_mystery

Written by 54532E9F11F86D22B786F089DC7D36A9EAAB081162DC28FBD5F6AB880951267B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1794013351384600679

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1794758318969200904
  • noteId - 1794758318969200904
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 54532E9F11F86D22B786F089DC7D36A9EAAB081162DC28FBD5F6AB880951267B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1716738702896
  • tweetId - 1794013351384600679
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Glass Onion has a 91% critic score and a 92% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes. The OP may have personally disliked the film, which is fine, but to claim it was bad by any standard other than your own is misleading. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/glass_onion_a_knives_out_mystery

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-05-26 15:51:42 UTC
(1716738702896)
2024-05-26 17:41:49 UTC
(1716745309524)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-05-27 04:19:24 UTC
(1716783564296)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-05-26 17:41:49 UTC
(1716745309524)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-05-26 14:49:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:45:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:36:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:16:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:05:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:47:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:46:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:33:06 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:27:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:26:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:07:55 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:06:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 10:57:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-27 15:07:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-27 09:29:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-28 04:44:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:41:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:28:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:24:33 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:45:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:17:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:10:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:10:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:08:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:06:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:00:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 10:56:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-27 16:53:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-27 07:23:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:36:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:09:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 12:04:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:54:08 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:41:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-05-26 11:06:45 -0500 Rating Details