Birdwatch Note
2024-05-07 13:31:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
A alegação de que apenas o Flamengo fez lobby pela volta do futebol é distorcida. A própria CBF foi favorável à volta, e quem era contra não chegou a se opor, como pode ser checado na matéria: https://www.uol.com.br/esporte/futebol/ultimas-noticias/2021/03/23/rogerio-caboclo-reuniao-clubes-cbf.htm
Written by 7C4498D4B449D50171C5EDD437EDECD1226C75E3470B56F4F3AF81DE3FB30E76
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1787657936044429423
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1787837694116041035
- noteId - 1787837694116041035
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7C4498D4B449D50171C5EDD437EDECD1226C75E3470B56F4F3AF81DE3FB30E76 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1715088697351
- tweetId - 1787657936044429423
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- A alegação de que apenas o Flamengo fez lobby pela volta do futebol é distorcida. A própria CBF foi favorável à volta, e quem era contra não chegou a se opor, como pode ser checado na matéria: https://www.uol.com.br/esporte/futebol/ultimas-noticias/2021/03/23/rogerio-caboclo-reuniao-clubes-cbf.htm
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-05-07 13:31:37 UTC (1715088697351) |
2024-05-07 18:09:38 UTC (1715105378434) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-05-08 01:19:02 UTC (1715131142166) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-05-07 18:09:38 UTC (1715105378434) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-05-07 19:26:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 11:09:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-08 01:57:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 23:57:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 19:23:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 16:20:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 13:15:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 12:53:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 11:04:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 18:26:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 11:18:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 10:06:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-07 10:36:47 -0500 | Rating Details |