Birdwatch Note
2024-04-25 13:54:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Jo Adell was not “clearly out”. The umpire ruled him out and MLB issued a statement that they “could not definitively determine that the runner touched second base prior to the fielder applying the tag” and therefore the call stood after review. https://abcnews.go.com/Sports/adell-angels-dispute-controversial-review-loss-orioles/story?id=109599217
Written by 6F137C6A95B31C2B2654AC1ADD4DCB48B2F4880AB91131ECFB258A87CBDAFBC3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1783272632466498015
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1783494765922951329
- noteId - 1783494765922951329
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6F137C6A95B31C2B2654AC1ADD4DCB48B2F4880AB91131ECFB258A87CBDAFBC3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1714053262584
- tweetId - 1783272632466498015
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Jo Adell was not “clearly out”. The umpire ruled him out and MLB issued a statement that they “could not definitively determine that the runner touched second base prior to the fielder applying the tag” and therefore the call stood after review. https://abcnews.go.com/Sports/adell-angels-dispute-controversial-review-loss-orioles/story?id=109599217
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-04-25 13:54:22 UTC (1714053262584) |
2024-04-25 20:29:32 UTC (1714076972288) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-04-26 05:28:59 UTC (1714109339772) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-04-25 20:29:32 UTC (1714076972288) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-04-25 10:32:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-25 09:01:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-25 09:04:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-25 11:35:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-04-25 09:55:52 -0500 | Rating Details |