Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-04-23 11:19:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

While "tofu-dreg" construction did contribute to the damage of the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake, the magnitude of the earthquake is actually 8.0, not 6.0 as shown in this picture. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Sichuan_earthquake https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sichuan_schools_corruption_scandal

Written by FDD585988E398242302C89E80197F43D637F7BF996AE3F105D06F575B44414F8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1782416855946207318

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1782730894488334484
  • noteId - 1782730894488334484
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - FDD585988E398242302C89E80197F43D637F7BF996AE3F105D06F575B44414F8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1713871141440
  • tweetId - 1782416855946207318
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • While "tofu-dreg" construction did contribute to the damage of the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake, the magnitude of the earthquake is actually 8.0, not 6.0 as shown in this picture. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Sichuan_earthquake https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sichuan_schools_corruption_scandal

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-04-23 11:19:01 UTC
(1713871141440)
2024-04-24 00:48:47 UTC
(1713919727076)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-04-24 05:51:20 UTC
(1713937880601)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-04-24 00:48:47 UTC
(1713919727076)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-04-23 09:31:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:45:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:25:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 07:43:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 06:24:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 15:31:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 14:31:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 09:35:43 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:56:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:48:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:34:03 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:21:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:16:05 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:02:42 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 07:14:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-27 21:21:22 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 09:13:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 09:05:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:28:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 07:30:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 09:59:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 09:47:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 09:35:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 09:30:35 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:54:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:54:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:27:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:17:54 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 08:05:02 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 07:38:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 07:28:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 07:13:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-23 06:29:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-11-23 06:24:02 -0600 Rating Details