Birdwatch Note
2024-04-22 01:42:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The photo is definitely not the same girl from the video, and I suspect that it has been photoshopped, however the other note's claim of it being AI appears incorrect imo. Hands, feet, and lighting all appear real, edges are distorted due to the mirror having beveled edges. https://tech.co/news/ways-detect-ai-images-examples
Written by 3A17C0C11A18853EE66F0C2DD2C95987F01521B332CE6120ABDDA6FE031CFAFE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1782164939106635930
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1782223376976609447
- noteId - 1782223376976609447
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3A17C0C11A18853EE66F0C2DD2C95987F01521B332CE6120ABDDA6FE031CFAFE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1713750139836
- tweetId - 1782164939106635930
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 1
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The photo is definitely not the same girl from the video, and I suspect that it has been photoshopped, however the other note's claim of it being AI appears incorrect imo. Hands, feet, and lighting all appear real, edges are distorted due to the mirror having beveled edges. https://tech.co/news/ways-detect-ai-images-examples
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2024-04-22 01:42:19 UTC (1713750139836) |
2024-04-22 04:41:58 UTC (1713760918784) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-04-22 13:33:39 UTC (1713792819406) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-04-22 04:41:58 UTC (1713760918784) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-04-22 07:33:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 22:45:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-22 06:51:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 20:58:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 20:57:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 20:56:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 20:50:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 20:48:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 20:47:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 21:09:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 20:58:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2024-04-21 20:45:59 -0500 | Rating Details |