Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-04-13 07:19:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

No. NASA didn’t publish study on snake plants providing life-saving oxygen. The claim is a distortion of a 1989 NASA study. https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-nasa-study-snake-plants-oxygen-survival-212605533455 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Clean_Air_Study

Written by BBBB6DD43837D1DE8F2E073D9F8343B438B7F8E02EFB59299B48C0E7669690C3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1778831677730501099

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1779046842598146510
  • noteId - 1779046842598146510
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - BBBB6DD43837D1DE8F2E073D9F8343B438B7F8E02EFB59299B48C0E7669690C3 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1712992795022
  • tweetId - 1778831677730501099
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • No. NASA didn’t publish study on snake plants providing life-saving oxygen. The claim is a distortion of a 1989 NASA study. https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-nasa-study-snake-plants-oxygen-survival-212605533455 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Clean_Air_Study

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-04-13 07:19:55 UTC
(1712992795022)
2024-04-13 18:06:27 UTC
(1713031587788)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-04-15 04:12:13 UTC
(1713154333742)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-04-13 18:06:27 UTC
(1713031587788)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-04-13 18:04:03 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 15:21:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 13:37:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 13:30:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 12:17:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 11:06:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 09:54:39 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 09:12:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 08:50:29 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 02:51:31 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-14 00:33:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 13:00:18 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 11:44:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 11:23:26 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 11:00:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 09:17:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 09:16:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 07:57:56 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 07:52:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 05:15:45 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 05:10:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 02:45:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-18 08:20:31 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 13:17:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 18:51:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 15:15:30 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 11:37:09 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 10:46:41 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 10:19:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 09:58:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 07:26:12 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 06:49:32 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 03:50:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 03:14:50 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 03:13:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 02:47:51 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 02:31:47 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 02:28:52 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-13 02:25:49 -0500 Rating Details