Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-04-06 01:03:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

A 2012 study did not find that women “store” men’s DNA after sexual intercourse, as suggested by an old headline, which recently resurfaced online, from a defunct website that repeatedly published misinformation. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-did-not-find-women-store-dna-intercourse-with-men-2024-01-22/ https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/jan/17/instagram-posts/no-womens-bodies-dont-store-dna-from-all-male-sexu/

Written by 6E7F4BC31EB4D5FDF8CF6FBBA3C6CFDFFFD49820A2B1EED535857DBE509E3111
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1776307099158380577

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1776415486764331350
  • noteId - 1776415486764331350
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6E7F4BC31EB4D5FDF8CF6FBBA3C6CFDFFFD49820A2B1EED535857DBE509E3111 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1712365430905
  • tweetId - 1776307099158380577
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • A 2012 study did not find that women “store” men’s DNA after sexual intercourse, as suggested by an old headline, which recently resurfaced online, from a defunct website that repeatedly published misinformation. https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/study-did-not-find-women-store-dna-intercourse-with-men-2024-01-22/ https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/jan/17/instagram-posts/no-womens-bodies-dont-store-dna-from-all-male-sexu/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-04-06 01:03:50 UTC
(1712365430905)
2024-04-06 04:57:58 UTC
(1712379478574)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-04-07 02:42:43 UTC
(1712457763632)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-04-06 04:57:58 UTC
(1712379478574)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-04-06 07:32:48 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-06 07:14:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-06 03:02:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-06 02:51:17 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-06 02:18:10 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 23:13:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 22:39:24 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 22:38:15 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:27:27 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:21:13 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:13:59 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:07:03 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:02:37 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:01:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-06 06:25:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-06 04:05:38 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-06 03:51:46 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-06 00:20:36 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 22:54:44 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 22:50:25 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:47:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:43:23 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:41:53 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:33:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:29:28 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:19:20 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 21:00:40 -0500 Rating Details
2024-04-05 20:17:21 -0500 Rating Details