Birdwatch Note
2024-03-29 09:30:47 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
To the CN post with Snooes.com as their reliable source…LOL…LMAO 😆 Snopes is not now, nor has it at any time EVER been remotely “reliable” or factual. Hint: never link snopes.com again in CNs. lol https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/business/media/snopes-plagiarism-David-Mikkelson.html https://anthonycolpo.com/fact-fudgers-why-snopes-is-a-hopelessly-biased-unreliable-website/
Written by 30E83EF17BE7202BAD8B61B43A5D2E233D6C3375C47D5082AA8159202482FC6F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1773488356535493047
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1773643962299064601
- noteId - 1773643962299064601
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 30E83EF17BE7202BAD8B61B43A5D2E233D6C3375C47D5082AA8159202482FC6F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1711704647982
- tweetId - 1773488356535493047
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- To the CN post with Snooes.com as their reliable source…LOL…LMAO 😆 Snopes is not now, nor has it at any time EVER been remotely “reliable” or factual. Hint: never link snopes.com again in CNs. lol https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/13/business/media/snopes-plagiarism-David-Mikkelson.html https://anthonycolpo.com/fact-fudgers-why-snopes-is-a-hopelessly-biased-unreliable-website/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-03-29 09:30:47 UTC (1711704647982) |
2024-03-29 21:59:07 UTC (1711749547255) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-03-30 10:19:22 UTC (1711793962354) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2024-03-29 21:59:07 UTC (1711749547255) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-03-29 21:40:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 16:55:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 15:31:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 14:42:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 12:02:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 09:14:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 08:14:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 07:34:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 06:58:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 19:35:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 14:04:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-29 08:50:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-31 20:41:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-05-13 12:10:08 -0500 | Rating Details |