Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-03-06 17:02:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This is a misreading of CBS' exit polls. Of the subset of voters who approve of Biden and voted in the GOP primary, 92% supported Haley. But it's not true that 92% of the Haley votes were from people who approve of Biden. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/super-tuesday-exit-polls-2024/

Written by 9D0B440E1E2C23DE2413D29AE9252C63331664D492D9DD1A36EDAC4D0485348B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1765371553154318468

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1765422695884177746
  • noteId - 1765422695884177746
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9D0B440E1E2C23DE2413D29AE9252C63331664D492D9DD1A36EDAC4D0485348B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1709744545323
  • tweetId - 1765371553154318468
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This is a misreading of CBS' exit polls. Of the subset of voters who approve of Biden and voted in the GOP primary, 92% supported Haley. But it's not true that 92% of the Haley votes were from people who approve of Biden. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/super-tuesday-exit-polls-2024/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-03-06 17:02:25 UTC
(1709744545323)
2024-03-06 20:10:05 UTC
(1709755805712)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-03-07 12:28:42 UTC
(1709814522945)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-03-06 20:10:05 UTC
(1709755805712)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-03-06 12:37:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:56:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:48:26 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:43:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:17:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:09:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:07:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-09 17:31:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 22:59:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 16:20:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 13:40:17 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 13:10:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 12:41:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:47:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:35:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:05:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 13:46:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 13:08:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 12:57:38 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 12:23:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 12:10:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 12:07:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 12:02:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-06 11:47:40 -0600 Rating Details