Birdwatch Note
2024-03-06 10:47:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
San Francisco found that rent controls were a net cost, and benefitted those in existing properties, at the expense of new arrivals to the city. In NYC a mayor maintained his rent controlled property, reducing supply, while living in the mayoral residence. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/rent-controls-winners-losers
Written by 81187E8DB09B6DFBA2815B135A614CF9269A439D5B7EC46E29EC88615AF89ACE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1765243835456553175
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1765328224039366712
- noteId - 1765328224039366712
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 81187E8DB09B6DFBA2815B135A614CF9269A439D5B7EC46E29EC88615AF89ACE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1709722021481
- tweetId - 1765243835456553175
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- San Francisco found that rent controls were a net cost, and benefitted those in existing properties, at the expense of new arrivals to the city. In NYC a mayor maintained his rent controlled property, reducing supply, while living in the mayoral residence. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/rent-controls-winners-losers
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-03-06 10:47:01 UTC (1709722021481) |
2024-03-06 20:10:05 UTC (1709755805712) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-03-07 12:28:42 UTC (1709814522945) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-03-06 20:10:05 UTC (1709755805712) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-03-06 14:12:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 11:57:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 06:04:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 05:51:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 05:46:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 05:05:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 14:10:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 08:54:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 08:36:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 08:27:48 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 05:48:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 09:09:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-03-06 07:25:36 -0600 | Rating Details |