Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-27 02:43:23 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The clinical trial data at the time did show 100% protection against death. The FDA restriction on the Johnson & Johnson vaccine was not related to lack of efficacy https://www.aha.org/news/headline/2022-05-06-fda-limits-jj-covid-19-vaccine-use-certain-adults

Written by 49C6CCBC611F3793DAE5D41CE4AF4685C99C78745D6078D4A8B41FEB8655383D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1761874831258083697

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1762307409199194210
  • noteId - 1762307409199194210
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 49C6CCBC611F3793DAE5D41CE4AF4685C99C78745D6078D4A8B41FEB8655383D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1709001803098
  • tweetId - 1761874831258083697
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The clinical trial data at the time did show 100% protection against death. The FDA restriction on the Johnson & Johnson vaccine was not related to lack of efficacy https://www.aha.org/news/headline/2022-05-06-fda-limits-jj-covid-19-vaccine-use-certain-adults

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-27 02:43:23 UTC
(1709001803098)
2024-02-28 10:46:50 UTC
(1709117210812)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-03-07 12:28:42 UTC
(1709814522945)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2024-02-28 10:46:50 UTC
(1709117210812)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-29 10:59:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-29 10:44:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-29 00:10:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-29 14:40:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-26 22:54:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-26 20:48:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-10 07:46:07 -0500 Rating Details
2024-02-29 14:30:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-29 13:30:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-29 10:03:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-29 09:37:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-29 09:15:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-12 05:05:26 -0500 Rating Details