Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-24 16:48:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The statement in the tweet is wrong. PG&E costs are much higher than the rest of the country, but PG&E does not serve all of northern California. Areas like Sacramento where SMUD provides the electricity have rates more in line with the rest of the Country. https://findenergy.com/ca/

Written by C1A00510EAF7AE32853C17BEFDCB849B64F8AFA63F37AF8817390449FD49D1F7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1761413742091260068

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1761432992692728279
  • noteId - 1761432992692728279
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C1A00510EAF7AE32853C17BEFDCB849B64F8AFA63F37AF8817390449FD49D1F7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1708793325958
  • tweetId - 1761413742091260068
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The statement in the tweet is wrong. PG&E costs are much higher than the rest of the country, but PG&E does not serve all of northern California. Areas like Sacramento where SMUD provides the electricity have rates more in line with the rest of the Country. https://findenergy.com/ca/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-24 16:48:45 UTC
(1708793325958)
2024-02-25 01:39:45 UTC
(1708825185968)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-02-25 01:39:45 UTC
(1708825185968)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-02-25 01:39:45 UTC
(1708825185968)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-24 23:34:14 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-24 22:21:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-24 22:50:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-24 12:44:17 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-24 11:09:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-24 15:53:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-24 15:11:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-24 12:10:37 -0600 Rating Details