Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-20 21:47:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Sehr viele Experten aus Wissenschaft und Praxis in den Bereichen Strafrecht, Medizin, Drogenforschung und Drogenpolitik, sprechen sich ausdrücklich FÜR das Gesetz aus. https://schildower-kreis.de/offener-brief-an-den-bundestag-professorinnen-und-professoren-fuer-das-cannabis-gesetz/

Written by 495C70F62B7410FB5CD8AC924F65DDF8B09B32A5DED696D7CE98849EE3F4B373
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1759930873225322666

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1760058531795943904
  • noteId - 1760058531795943904
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 495C70F62B7410FB5CD8AC924F65DDF8B09B32A5DED696D7CE98849EE3F4B373 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1708465628942
  • tweetId - 1759930873225322666
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Sehr viele Experten aus Wissenschaft und Praxis in den Bereichen Strafrecht, Medizin, Drogenforschung und Drogenpolitik, sprechen sich ausdrücklich FÜR das Gesetz aus. https://schildower-kreis.de/offener-brief-an-den-bundestag-professorinnen-und-professoren-fuer-das-cannabis-gesetz/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-20 21:47:08 UTC
(1708465628942)
2024-02-21 04:10:14 UTC
(1708488614531)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-21 09:05:56 UTC
(1708506356169)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-21 04:10:14 UTC
(1708488614531)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-20 20:21:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 18:37:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 17:15:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 15:50:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 12:15:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 08:50:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 06:14:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-22 13:19:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-22 04:52:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-22 02:30:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-22 00:17:18 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 04:58:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 04:32:45 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 02:42:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 01:43:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 00:35:30 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 23:21:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 19:49:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 17:14:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 16:57:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 16:32:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-22 12:49:21 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 16:35:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 12:00:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 06:57:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 04:50:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 04:43:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-21 02:22:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 18:37:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 16:18:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 15:54:53 -0600 Rating Details