Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-19 16:57:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Nothing in the article supports the claim that the strike led 20 people to lose their job. Rather, the article indicates Tesla's decision was a result of the 20 employee's job being redundant and unnecessary. https://t.co/2VPFI2nUEH

Written by 441C7F3B5E2104FBA96348A8DF21AE5A314F93E7D2EBA6F44D98C3284D61CFBD
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1759599373242024197

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1759623243517100190
  • noteId - 1759623243517100190
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 441C7F3B5E2104FBA96348A8DF21AE5A314F93E7D2EBA6F44D98C3284D61CFBD Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1708361848132
  • tweetId - 1759599373242024197
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Nothing in the article supports the claim that the strike led 20 people to lose their job. Rather, the article indicates Tesla's decision was a result of the 20 employee's job being redundant and unnecessary. https://t.co/2VPFI2nUEH

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-19 16:57:28 UTC
(1708361848132)
2024-02-19 22:19:08 UTC
(1708381148262)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-02-20 02:15:28 UTC
(1708395328361)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-02-19 22:19:08 UTC
(1708381148262)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-19 14:10:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 11:16:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 11:05:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 13:44:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 13:36:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 12:58:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 12:46:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 11:54:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 11:27:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 13:44:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 13:24:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 12:34:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 12:10:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 11:57:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 11:51:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-19 11:35:29 -0600 Rating Details