Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-15 13:08:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Le h-index est un outil quantitatif qui ne mesure pas qualitativement les citations. Dit autrement, être cité de nombreuses fois pour être contredit fait aussi augmenter l'h-index. Le h-index comporte de nombreux angles morts et ne détermine pas la qualité "scientifique". https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indice_h#Critiques

Written by D92EF3349C276AEE7D8BD35026C216DEE75C2A1011DE5E0F8D561A21EF10F95F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1757885756721246616

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1758116032462340115
  • noteId - 1758116032462340115
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D92EF3349C276AEE7D8BD35026C216DEE75C2A1011DE5E0F8D561A21EF10F95F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1708002501011
  • tweetId - 1757885756721246616
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Le h-index est un outil quantitatif qui ne mesure pas qualitativement les citations. Dit autrement, être cité de nombreuses fois pour être contredit fait aussi augmenter l'h-index. Le h-index comporte de nombreux angles morts et ne détermine pas la qualité "scientifique". https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indice_h#Critiques

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-15 13:08:21 UTC
(1708002501011)
2024-02-15 17:44:51 UTC
(1708019091016)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-16 03:27:03 UTC
(1708054023024)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2024-02-15 17:44:51 UTC
(1708019091016)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-15 16:55:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 15:53:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 10:48:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 09:27:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:54:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:42:25 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:22:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:11:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:08:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 07:50:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 07:45:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 07:31:21 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 07:28:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 07:16:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 23:47:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 17:59:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 09:55:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:35:01 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:21:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:10:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 07:50:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-16 06:17:52 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-20 03:18:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 15:38:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 12:58:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 12:05:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 09:04:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:33:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:32:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:29:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 08:23:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-15 07:16:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-03-09 00:47:34 -0600 Rating Details