Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-10 21:10:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

NNN It doesn't mean that her ancestor got raped. They are also maybe part of the few African Americans that owned slaves. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_slave_owners#:~:text=In%201830%2C%20there%20were%203%2C775,South%20Carolina%2C%20Virginia%20and%20Maryland.

Written by 41A345AC7CD942C3F892084FEEFC7ADD84A6C5DF1F2153D6C137AD0D54346A6C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1755940527864721698

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1756425484630442338
  • noteId - 1756425484630442338
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 41A345AC7CD942C3F892084FEEFC7ADD84A6C5DF1F2153D6C137AD0D54346A6C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1707599443002
  • tweetId - 1755940527864721698
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN It doesn't mean that her ancestor got raped. They are also maybe part of the few African Americans that owned slaves. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_slave_owners#:~:text=In%201830%2C%20there%20were%203%2C775,South%20Carolina%2C%20Virginia%20and%20Maryland.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-10 21:10:43 UTC
(1707599443002)
2024-02-11 00:22:02 UTC
(1707610922252)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-02-11 04:10:00 UTC
(1707624600478)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-02-11 00:22:02 UTC
(1707610922252)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-10 20:46:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 18:40:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 18:40:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 17:50:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 17:48:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 17:21:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 16:28:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 16:27:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 16:25:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 15:43:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 15:41:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 15:23:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-11 00:48:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 22:34:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-11 02:50:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 22:44:12 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 17:41:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 16:45:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 16:32:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 15:57:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 15:40:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 15:28:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-10 15:27:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-17 09:36:27 -0600 Rating Details