Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-07 11:37:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There was no DDoS attack by toothbrushes. The only mention of this before was a hypothetical article stating it might happen. https://archive.is/yzAg7 Smart toothbrushes also generally aren't connected to wifi but rather by Bluetooth so unable to do any DDoS attacks over the internet.

Written by 9BEF814DAD8C536BB11E2FCE98E86358591919994D0D490C44DBA58986C98601
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1754990650192437441

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1755193981162446924
  • noteId - 1755193981162446924
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9BEF814DAD8C536BB11E2FCE98E86358591919994D0D490C44DBA58986C98601 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1707305829691
  • tweetId - 1754990650192437441
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There was no DDoS attack by toothbrushes. The only mention of this before was a hypothetical article stating it might happen. https://archive.is/yzAg7 Smart toothbrushes also generally aren't connected to wifi but rather by Bluetooth so unable to do any DDoS attacks over the internet.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-07 11:37:09 UTC
(1707305829691)
2024-02-07 15:37:51 UTC
(1707320271122)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-08 02:46:49 UTC
(1707360409992)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-02-07 15:37:51 UTC
(1707320271122)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-07 11:09:45 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 10:56:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 10:46:38 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 10:34:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 10:27:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 10:27:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 09:19:18 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 08:45:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 08:30:00 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 08:27:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 07:32:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 06:08:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 11:58:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 11:36:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 11:18:25 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 11:17:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 11:14:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 11:13:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 10:49:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 10:47:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 10:41:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 08:56:18 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 08:39:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 08:05:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 06:13:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 05:56:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 05:54:37 -0600 Rating Details