Birdwatch Note
2024-02-06 19:50:30 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN, the guy is better, he wouldn’t last longer than 2 days if he was actually cheating. I don’t see a point of rebuying a 80$ game to get banned for snapping with 4000dpi
Written by 61BECDD77D7ACCC2CA89F5CEA3EC94604857778D255B54C8742212D6D7FC3741
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1753896425094611397
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1754955748843442415
- noteId - 1754955748843442415
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 61BECDD77D7ACCC2CA89F5CEA3EC94604857778D255B54C8742212D6D7FC3741 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1707249030681
- tweetId - 1753896425094611397
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN, the guy is better, he wouldn’t last longer than 2 days if he was actually cheating. I don’t see a point of rebuying a 80$ game to get banned for snapping with 4000dpi
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2024-02-06 19:50:30 UTC (1707249030681) |
2024-02-06 23:35:05 UTC (1707262505309) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL | 2024-02-07 00:47:28 UTC (1707266848650) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 2024-02-06 23:35:05 UTC (1707262505309) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-02-06 16:08:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 16:06:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 15:40:10 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 15:18:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 15:08:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 15:07:44 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:59:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:55:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:36:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:28:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:21:08 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:08:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:04:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 13:51:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-07 05:56:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 18:56:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 18:56:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-09 21:30:17 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 15:17:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 15:10:27 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:56:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:55:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:49:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:18:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-06 14:11:17 -0600 | Rating Details |