Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-02-06 08:43:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

By bringing up the correlation is not causation argument, OP is acknowledging this argument and providing an opinion that there is a causal link. A CN simply restating what is already said in the post: the fact that correlation does not prove causation is not helpful context.

Written by 872D347EEC5A49E0D8D1D4323B611DF30EC4A8C681651B7203DE9263418CF2CF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1754685546155085863

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1754787859310285261
  • noteId - 1754787859310285261
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 872D347EEC5A49E0D8D1D4323B611DF30EC4A8C681651B7203DE9263418CF2CF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1707209002699
  • tweetId - 1754685546155085863
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • By bringing up the correlation is not causation argument, OP is acknowledging this argument and providing an opinion that there is a causal link. A CN simply restating what is already said in the post: the fact that correlation does not prove causation is not helpful context.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-02-06 08:43:22 UTC
(1707209002699)
2024-02-06 15:42:47 UTC
(1707234167637)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-02-07 00:47:28 UTC
(1707266848650)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2024-02-06 15:42:47 UTC
(1707234167637)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-02-06 11:37:46 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 08:50:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 08:01:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 07:49:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 07:45:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 07:12:52 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 07:03:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 06:47:49 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 03:14:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 03:04:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 02:59:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 08:04:18 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 02:50:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 02:44:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-09 13:39:30 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 09:51:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 08:44:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-07 07:13:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 23:35:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 17:29:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 13:57:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 13:31:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 09:26:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 07:13:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 04:36:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-02-06 02:56:30 -0600 Rating Details