Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-01-28 12:28:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no proof that either HMS Diamond or the USS Mason have been hit or damaged from any reputable source. HMS Diamond “successfully repelled” a Houthi drone attack as late as today: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/houthis-attack-british-navy-ship-diamond-b2486201.html

Written by 3E4E9762BF7CBADFFC265B7BD0ADFB2C3EB1F93249602023B1BC074EE2A3BCB5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1751277664021717161

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1751582989891285297
  • noteId - 1751582989891285297
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3E4E9762BF7CBADFFC265B7BD0ADFB2C3EB1F93249602023B1BC074EE2A3BCB5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1706444902287
  • tweetId - 1751277664021717161
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • There is no proof that either HMS Diamond or the USS Mason have been hit or damaged from any reputable source. HMS Diamond “successfully repelled” a Houthi drone attack as late as today: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/houthis-attack-british-navy-ship-diamond-b2486201.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-01-28 12:28:22 UTC
(1706444902287)
2024-01-28 18:24:18 UTC
(1706466258278)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-29 10:09:09 UTC
(1706522949317)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-28 18:24:18 UTC
(1706466258278)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-01-28 23:40:19 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 13:23:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 12:56:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 10:41:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 10:28:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 09:42:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 09:33:45 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 07:49:29 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 06:29:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-29 04:35:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 18:35:43 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 17:48:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 16:59:10 -0600 Rating Details