Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-01-27 15:09:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Selective testing in this report misrepresents the situation by ignoring the largest most successful charging network, and the standardization on the North American Charging Standard that happened this year. https://electrek.co/2023/12/18/gm-ford-ev-owners-tesla-supercharger-access-february/

Written by 3568F67DF1938D60B3B65EC804C414F90587A03509B62D15AFA0276D3D571A5D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1750866183182754053

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1751261265840783658
  • noteId - 1751261265840783658
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3568F67DF1938D60B3B65EC804C414F90587A03509B62D15AFA0276D3D571A5D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1706368197290
  • tweetId - 1750866183182754053
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Selective testing in this report misrepresents the situation by ignoring the largest most successful charging network, and the standardization on the North American Charging Standard that happened this year. https://electrek.co/2023/12/18/gm-ford-ev-owners-tesla-supercharger-access-february/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-01-27 15:09:57 UTC
(1706368197290)
2024-01-28 02:22:43 UTC
(1706408563402)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-28 02:22:43 UTC
(1706408563402)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-28 02:22:43 UTC
(1706408563402)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-01-27 17:52:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 12:28:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 11:21:04 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 09:41:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 23:19:31 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 21:38:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 06:40:39 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 23:24:38 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 21:48:06 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 21:09:07 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 19:50:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 19:53:36 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-28 19:50:44 -0600 Rating Details