Birdwatch Note
2024-01-27 10:52:48 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Of a total of 64 outcomes in studies of GET, NICE graded 52 (81%) as “VERY LOW” quality and 12 (19%) as “LOW” quality. It has been established that GET is not a suitable treatment for MECFS, and a significant cohort of Long Covid patients meet MECFS diagnostic criteria. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-ng10091/documents/evidence-review-7
Written by 0A20BC45A44EB62CB363343297CCC67B9DD477674A608FA75CEA11A7AE82E6F2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1751031484440293858
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1751196551542911211
- noteId - 1751196551542911211
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0A20BC45A44EB62CB363343297CCC67B9DD477674A608FA75CEA11A7AE82E6F2 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1706352768201
- tweetId - 1751031484440293858
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Of a total of 64 outcomes in studies of GET, NICE graded 52 (81%) as “VERY LOW” quality and 12 (19%) as “LOW” quality. It has been established that GET is not a suitable treatment for MECFS, and a significant cohort of Long Covid patients meet MECFS diagnostic criteria. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-ng10091/documents/evidence-review-7
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-01-27 10:52:48 UTC (1706352768201) |
2024-01-27 23:00:08 UTC (1706396408654) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-01-28 02:22:43 UTC (1706408563402) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-01-27 23:00:08 UTC (1706396408654) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-01-27 18:00:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 13:51:11 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 11:03:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 10:35:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 06:04:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 05:51:09 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 05:31:33 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 05:19:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-28 10:45:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-28 05:23:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-28 04:46:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-28 01:02:49 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 21:08:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 20:57:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 19:51:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-27 19:43:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-29 14:56:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-28 17:36:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-02-13 06:56:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-31 15:20:34 -0600 | Rating Details |