Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-01-24 16:47:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Der Name „Mohammed“ belegte 2023 deutschlandweit den Platz 25. https://www.beliebte-vornamen.de/jahrgang/j2023/top-500-2023 Platz 1 belegte der Name „Mohammed“ in Berlin. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/noah-abgehangt-mohammed-ist-der-beliebteste-babyname-in-berlin-9782666.html

Written by 4A62F4371206C112E3773304D60E95BE58B8D0D663D7175C07C01A6CC5926336
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1749913255735124473

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1750198610942132572
  • noteId - 1750198610942132572
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4A62F4371206C112E3773304D60E95BE58B8D0D663D7175C07C01A6CC5926336 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1706114840625
  • tweetId - 1749913255735124473
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Der Name „Mohammed“ belegte 2023 deutschlandweit den Platz 25. https://www.beliebte-vornamen.de/jahrgang/j2023/top-500-2023 Platz 1 belegte der Name „Mohammed“ in Berlin. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/noah-abgehangt-mohammed-ist-der-beliebteste-babyname-in-berlin-9782666.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-01-24 16:47:20 UTC
(1706114840625)
2024-01-24 20:56:58 UTC
(1706129818062)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-25 01:29:29 UTC
(1706146169070)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-24 20:56:58 UTC
(1706129818062)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-01-24 16:13:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 16:13:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 16:12:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 16:09:37 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 15:54:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 14:31:42 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 12:25:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 11:19:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 11:03:54 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-26 18:19:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-26 14:56:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-26 14:53:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-26 14:25:40 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-25 03:35:27 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-25 02:45:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-25 02:08:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-25 01:06:32 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 19:58:56 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 18:40:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 17:51:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 16:03:28 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 15:37:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 12:53:50 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 12:51:45 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 12:32:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 12:15:51 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 10:56:57 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-27 04:27:33 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-25 01:36:09 -0600 Rating Details