Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-01-18 02:35:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Il n'existe aucun lien entre le vaccin covid et l'infertilité. Voici des études scientifiques (bien plus fiables que Valeurs Actuelles) sur le sujet : 👉https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33985514/ 👉https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2781360 👉https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n509

Written by 58E1074BFAECA91CE0290C8B0A852B0618EF850A694E662F2B37D80CC47AA4C3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1747606118761635902

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1747809984493089087
  • noteId - 1747809984493089087
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 58E1074BFAECA91CE0290C8B0A852B0618EF850A694E662F2B37D80CC47AA4C3 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1705545347699
  • tweetId - 1747606118761635902
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Il n'existe aucun lien entre le vaccin covid et l'infertilité. Voici des études scientifiques (bien plus fiables que Valeurs Actuelles) sur le sujet : 👉https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33985514/ 👉https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2781360 👉https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n509

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-01-18 02:35:47 UTC
(1705545347699)
2024-01-18 16:47:21 UTC
(1705596441651)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-19 12:24:59 UTC
(1705667099335)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2024-01-18 16:47:21 UTC
(1705596441651)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-01-18 00:01:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-17 23:58:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-17 23:39:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-21 05:41:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-19 12:10:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 06:54:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 03:42:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 02:34:21 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 01:09:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-17 23:43:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-17 23:41:58 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-17 23:22:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-17 20:52:44 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-21 13:33:13 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-21 09:35:22 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-21 07:57:17 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-21 05:50:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-21 05:48:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-05-08 02:03:39 -0500 Rating Details