Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-01-07 12:59:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Bien qu’il ne faille pas confondre météo et climat la réalité d’un réchauffement climatique est discutable et controversée par de nombreux scientifiques et prix Nobel. Les publications du GIEC sont basées sur des consensus et vote et non pas sur des faits scientifiques. https://x.com/elpis_r/status/1656787572096417792

Written by 53E8DAA336A7BF80EB9937835A61B844170C3184242A3FBAF8BF24DAE7351EE9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1743914737484603417

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1743980753916932404
  • noteId - 1743980753916932404
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 53E8DAA336A7BF80EB9937835A61B844170C3184242A3FBAF8BF24DAE7351EE9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1704632387982
  • tweetId - 1743914737484603417
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Bien qu’il ne faille pas confondre météo et climat la réalité d’un réchauffement climatique est discutable et controversée par de nombreux scientifiques et prix Nobel. Les publications du GIEC sont basées sur des consensus et vote et non pas sur des faits scientifiques. https://x.com/elpis_r/status/1656787572096417792

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-01-07 12:59:47 UTC
(1704632387982)
2024-01-07 15:03:09 UTC
(1704639789869)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-01-08 02:01:53 UTC
(1704679313262)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-01-07 15:03:09 UTC
(1704639789869)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-01-07 18:04:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 16:38:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 15:52:30 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 15:09:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 09:53:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 09:03:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 08:29:48 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 07:45:34 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 07:44:24 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 07:34:38 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 07:16:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-07 07:02:47 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-08 18:01:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-08 17:51:03 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-08 09:38:59 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-08 07:47:53 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-08 09:58:25 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-08 07:06:18 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-08 02:09:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-08 00:10:32 -0600 Rating Details