Birdwatch Note
2024-01-04 04:12:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Michael Jackson fue a una mansión de Epstein en Palm Beach (Acudió a la mansión a pedir consejo financiero, debido a que estaba teniendo problemas con Sony), pero en el mismo texto se menciona poco después que no intimó con ningún menor. Documentación oficial: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1320/12/giuffre-v-maxwell/
Written by 425166ACA40E0D084EFE9D4E1611BBEAED67BA20DE73815E513D39BDFBCB6077
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1742723395823747464
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1742760803357344089
- noteId - 1742760803357344089
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 425166ACA40E0D084EFE9D4E1611BBEAED67BA20DE73815E513D39BDFBCB6077 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1704341529109
- tweetId - 1742723395823747464
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Michael Jackson fue a una mansión de Epstein en Palm Beach (Acudió a la mansión a pedir consejo financiero, debido a que estaba teniendo problemas con Sony), pero en el mismo texto se menciona poco después que no intimó con ningún menor. Documentación oficial: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/1320/12/giuffre-v-maxwell/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-01-04 04:12:09 UTC (1704341529109) |
2024-01-04 09:04:30 UTC (1704359070773) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-01-05 01:56:37 UTC (1704419797992) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-01-04 09:04:30 UTC (1704359070773) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-01-04 11:56:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 01:30:04 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 01:24:00 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 01:18:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 00:42:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 00:40:45 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 00:34:57 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 00:32:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 00:21:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 00:15:30 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-03 23:59:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-03 23:48:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-03 23:37:21 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-04 18:46:07 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-06 00:55:15 -0600 | Rating Details |