Birdwatch Note
2024-01-02 17:51:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The person on the image is not a Chinese noblewomen and has no connection to Chinese imperial families. The CCP has not banned genetic testing of Chinese royals. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/premium/article/tarim-basin-mummies-dna-archaeology#:~:text=The%20Tarim%20Basin%20is%20located,look%20at%20their%20ancient%20DNA.
Written by 490C3468FFB572A2F69E9F48CD9B95F04DA25B0FA4322D72D435BAE9184B06BF
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1741656028347826242
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1742242111678783669
- noteId - 1742242111678783669
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 490C3468FFB572A2F69E9F48CD9B95F04DA25B0FA4322D72D435BAE9184B06BF Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1704217863373
- tweetId - 1741656028347826242
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The person on the image is not a Chinese noblewomen and has no connection to Chinese imperial families. The CCP has not banned genetic testing of Chinese royals. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/premium/article/tarim-basin-mummies-dna-archaeology#:~:text=The%20Tarim%20Basin%20is%20located,look%20at%20their%20ancient%20DNA.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2024-01-02 17:51:03 UTC (1704217863373) |
2024-01-03 04:41:53 UTC (1704256913230) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-01-03 09:49:49 UTC (1704275389997) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-01-03 04:41:53 UTC (1704256913230) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-01-02 18:21:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 17:55:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 17:31:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 17:09:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 16:59:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 16:16:31 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 14:21:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 12:53:28 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-03 05:45:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-03 05:14:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-03 00:36:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 21:10:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 20:18:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-02 19:27:49 -0600 | Rating Details |