Birdwatch Note
2023-12-31 09:52:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
In dem Beitrag wird behauptet das 75% der Fläche unter Wasser stünden, dafür gibt es im Beitrag keinen Beleg. Die bekannten Pegelstände lassen einen Rückschluss auf 75% Überflutung nicht zu. https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/Liveticker-zum-Hochwasser-in-Niedersachsen-Der-Bundeskanzler-kommt,hochwasser4948.html
Written by 850413D1FF52CE1729268E343BA89BD66095760EB29625A9E0F4A9151F171257
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1741094584157970463
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1741396948182049184
- noteId - 1741396948182049184
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 850413D1FF52CE1729268E343BA89BD66095760EB29625A9E0F4A9151F171257 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1704016360690
- tweetId - 1741094584157970463
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- In dem Beitrag wird behauptet das 75% der Fläche unter Wasser stünden, dafür gibt es im Beitrag keinen Beleg. Die bekannten Pegelstände lassen einen Rückschluss auf 75% Überflutung nicht zu. https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/Liveticker-zum-Hochwasser-in-Niedersachsen-Der-Bundeskanzler-kommt,hochwasser4948.html
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-12-31 09:52:40 UTC (1704016360690) |
2023-12-31 14:01:48 UTC (1704031308087) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2024-01-01 01:58:29 UTC (1704074309478) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-31 14:01:48 UTC (1704031308087) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-12-31 10:51:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-31 08:00:29 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-31 07:38:59 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-31 07:25:25 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-31 05:51:37 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-31 05:37:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2023-12-31 05:16:16 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-01-02 06:01:14 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-01-02 04:55:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-01-03 11:56:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-01-04 07:31:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-01-03 19:35:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
2024-02-23 05:03:10 -0600 | Rating Details |