Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-12-30 16:03:59 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

A CN should disprove or provide proof. At least it should provide perspective on the matter based on facts. O-post refers to unidentified witnesses (NYT). There is evidence to question NYT as source of indisputable proof. https://x.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1740641517847335009?s=20

Written by ACED4DD9B9224822EFA17C83728A5AA1F3770853164DFD9DD6758234A5CB16F6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1741045221138575364

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1741128002749038885
  • noteId - 1741128002749038885
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - ACED4DD9B9224822EFA17C83728A5AA1F3770853164DFD9DD6758234A5CB16F6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1703952239106
  • tweetId - 1741045221138575364
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • A CN should disprove or provide proof. At least it should provide perspective on the matter based on facts. O-post refers to unidentified witnesses (NYT). There is evidence to question NYT as source of indisputable proof. https://x.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/1740641517847335009?s=20

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-12-30 16:03:59 UTC
(1703952239106)
2023-12-30 17:59:47 UTC
(1703959187600)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-12-31 01:13:04 UTC
(1703985184847)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-12-30 17:59:47 UTC
(1703959187600)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-12-30 18:13:37 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 17:49:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 16:55:43 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 16:51:12 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 15:31:54 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 11:57:44 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 11:19:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 11:06:50 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 11:04:47 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 11:03:28 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 10:59:01 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 10:55:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 10:39:41 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 10:31:09 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 10:15:55 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 10:14:31 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 10:12:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-30 10:09:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 04:08:04 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 03:45:49 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 03:34:30 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 01:59:45 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 01:47:21 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 01:17:07 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 01:02:59 -0600 Rating Details
2023-12-31 00:26:45 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-24 00:04:36 -0600 Rating Details