Birdwatch Note
2023-12-29 21:44:35 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Yes there are brands out there that can verify people, however, Delirium is not eligible to verify people due to not having a yellow checkmark beside their username. This post is misleading. https://business.twitter.com/en/blog/twitter-verification-for-organizations.html
Written by B3ACE53910BC9894D2883073C394DB52DB5B2AB768E4450BC29C5251B9F1752E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1740848702921768991
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1740851333077295491
- noteId - 1740851333077295491
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B3ACE53910BC9894D2883073C394DB52DB5B2AB768E4450BC29C5251B9F1752E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1703886275919
- tweetId - 1740848702921768991
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Yes there are brands out there that can verify people, however, Delirium is not eligible to verify people due to not having a yellow checkmark beside their username. This post is misleading. https://business.twitter.com/en/blog/twitter-verification-for-organizations.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-29 21:44:35 UTC (1703886275919) |
2023-12-29 23:42:35 UTC (1703893355751) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-30 01:36:08 UTC (1703900168817) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL | 2023-12-29 23:42:35 UTC (1703893355751) |
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-29 17:58:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 17:23:02 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 17:12:12 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 17:05:58 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 16:37:51 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 16:31:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 16:24:24 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 16:14:38 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 16:06:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 16:03:43 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 15:56:50 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 15:52:06 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 15:46:18 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 15:46:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-29 15:45:18 -0600 | Rating Details |